On Thu, 2016-11-10 at 09:03 -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Yep, it is probably better to merge Jani patch before while no platform
> is using that flag, but one way or another feel free to use:
Agreed. I'll send an updated version of the first two patches because of the
ddb_size that is wrong, so I
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 05:23:07PM +0200, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira wrote:
> Geminilake is an Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
> following Broxton.
>
> Let's start by adding the platform definition. PCI IDs and plaform
> specific code will follow.
>
> v2: Rebase (don't allow dev
Yep, it is probably better to merge Jani patch before while no platform
is using that flag, but one way or another feel free to use:
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 06:40:29PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
wrote:
> Geminilake is an Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
> following Broxton.
>
> Let's start by adding the platform definition. PCI IDs and plaform
> specific code will follow.
>
> v2: Rebase
Geminilake is an Intel® Processor containing Intel® HD Graphics
following Broxton.
Let's start by adding the platform definition. PCI IDs and plaform
specific code will follow.
v2: Rebase (don't allow dev to be used with the new macro).
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira