On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:55:20PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:50:39PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > The MST vs.
Op 28-07-16 om 16:50 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> The MST vs. SST selection should depend purely on the choice of the
> connector/encoder. So don't try to determine the correct DDI mode
> based on the intel_dp->is_mst, which
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:16:19AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:50:39PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > The MST vs. SST selection should depend purely on the choice of the
> >
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:50:39PM +0300, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> The MST vs. SST selection should depend purely on the choice of the
> connector/encoder. So don't try to determine the correct DDI mode
> based on the
From: Ville Syrjälä
The MST vs. SST selection should depend purely on the choice of the
connector/encoder. So don't try to determine the correct DDI mode
based on the intel_dp->is_mst, which simply tells us whether the sink
is in MST mode or not. Instead derive the