2014-03-18 14:11 GMT-03:00 Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
sent a patch series for
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, we have discussed this and it seems everybody prefers to have
the POSTING_READ calls on the macro, so I'll just change the patches
to do this, and then the comment will disappear.
I think for consistency we should
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
sent a patch series for this: [PATCH 00/15] Unify interrupt register
init/reset.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:11:38AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 08:10:19PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
sent a patch
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
And rename is to GEN5_IRQ_INIT.
We have discussed doing equivalent changes on July 2013, and I even
sent a patch series for this: [PATCH 00/15] Unify interrupt register
init/reset. Now that the BDW code was merged, I have one more
argument in favor of
