Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract PDE writes

2013-05-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:27:41PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:15:32 -0700 > Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > It also makes some sense IMO to have these two functions separate > > irrespective of the number of callers. > > > > Only the single caller for now, but that will change

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract PDE writes

2013-05-02 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:15:32 -0700 Ben Widawsky wrote: > It also makes some sense IMO to have these two functions separate > irrespective of the number of callers. > > Only the single caller for now, but that will change as we add more > PPGTTs. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky > --- > drivers

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/12] drm/i915: Extract PDE writes

2013-04-23 Thread Ben Widawsky
It also makes some sense IMO to have these two functions separate irrespective of the number of callers. Only the single caller for now, but that will change as we add more PPGTTs. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 22 +++--- 1 file changed, 1