On ke, 2016-09-14 at 07:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since we only use the more generic unlocked variant, just rename it as
> the normal i915_gem_active_wait(). The temporary cost is that we need to
> always acquire the reference in a RCU safe manner, but the benefit is
> that we will combine
Since we only use the more generic unlocked variant, just rename it as
the normal i915_gem_active_wait(). The temporary cost is that we need to
always acquire the reference in a RCU safe manner, but the benefit is
that we will combine the common paths.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
