Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/66] drm/i915: Add a couple of missing i915_active_fini()

2020-07-21 Thread Intel
On 2020-07-15 13:50, Chris Wilson wrote: We use i915_active_fini() as a debug check on the i915_active state before freeing. If we forget to call it, we may end up angering the debugobjects contained within. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström ___

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/66] drm/i915: Add a couple of missing i915_active_fini()

2020-07-17 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 15/07/2020 12:50, Chris Wilson wrote: We use i915_active_fini() as a debug check on the i915_active state before freeing. If we forget to call it, we may end up angering the debugobjects contained within. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/66] drm/i915: Add a couple of missing i915_active_fini()

2020-07-15 Thread Chris Wilson
We use i915_active_fini() as a debug check on the i915_active state before freeing. If we forget to call it, we may end up angering the debugobjects contained within. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_frontbuffer.c| 2 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_engi