On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 03:01:27PM -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> We're currently doing it in two different ways, none of them based on
> the wm_params struct. Both places are correct, so I chose to keep the
> one in skl_compute_wm_levels() since it's the function that sets the
> other values for the
We're currently doing it in two different ways, none of them based on
the wm_params struct. Both places are correct, so I chose to keep the
one in skl_compute_wm_levels() since it's the function that sets the
other values for the same struct. But I'm open to better suggestions
on the place to assig
