On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:55:16AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 23/05/16 11:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:26:39AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>>@@ -385,20 +384,18 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
> >>>* for now who owns a GuC cl
On 23/05/16 11:17, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:26:39AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
@@ -385,20 +384,18 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
* for now who owns a GuC client. But for future owner of GuC
* client, need to make
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:26:39AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >@@ -385,20 +384,18 @@ static void guc_init_ctx_desc(struct intel_guc *guc,
> > * for now who owns a GuC client. But for future owner of GuC
> > * client, need to make sure lrc is pinned prior to enter here.
On 22/05/16 14:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
We want to give a name to the currently anonymous per-engine struct
inside the context, so that we can assign it to a local variable and
save clumsy typing. The name we have chosen is intel_context as it
reflects the HW facing portion of the context state (
We want to give a name to the currently anonymous per-engine struct
inside the context, so that we can assign it to a local variable and
save clumsy typing. The name we have chosen is intel_context as it
reflects the HW facing portion of the context state (the logical context
state, the registers,
