Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor

On 6/9/2021 9:36 PM, Matthew Brost wrote: From: Michal Wajdeczko Definition of the CTB descriptor has changed, leaving only minimal shared fields like HEAD/TAIL/STATUS. Both HEAD and TAIL are now in dwords. Add some ABI documentation and implement required changes. v2: (Daniele) -

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor

From: Michal Wajdeczko Definition of the CTB descriptor has changed, leaving only minimal shared fields like HEAD/TAIL/STATUS. Both HEAD and TAIL are now in dwords. Add some ABI documentation and implement required changes. v2: (Daniele) - Drop GUC_CTB_STATUS_NO_BACKCHANNEL,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor

On 08.06.2021 02:59, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote: > > > On 6/7/2021 11:03 AM, Matthew Brost wrote: >> From: Michal Wajdeczko >> >> Definition of the CTB descriptor has changed, leaving only >> minimal shared fields like HEAD/TAIL/STATUS. >> >> Both HEAD and TAIL are now in dwords. >> >> Add

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor

On 6/7/2021 11:03 AM, Matthew Brost wrote: From: Michal Wajdeczko Definition of the CTB descriptor has changed, leaving only minimal shared fields like HEAD/TAIL/STATUS. Both HEAD and TAIL are now in dwords. Add some ABI documentation and implement required changes. Signed-off-by: Michal

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/guc: New definition of the CTB descriptor

From: Michal Wajdeczko Definition of the CTB descriptor has changed, leaving only minimal shared fields like HEAD/TAIL/STATUS. Both HEAD and TAIL are now in dwords. Add some ABI documentation and implement required changes. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost ---