Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915: Rename residual ringbuf parameters

2016-07-21 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 03:01:07PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Now that we have a clear ring/engine split and a struct intel_ring, we > > no longer need the stopgap ringbuf names. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915: Rename residual ringbuf parameters

2016-07-21 Thread Joonas Lahtinen
On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:11 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Now that we have a clear ring/engine split and a struct intel_ring, we > no longer need the stopgap ringbuf names. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Why is this a separate patch? List the renames here too, with

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915: Rename residual ringbuf parameters

2016-07-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Now that we have a clear ring/engine split and a struct intel_ring, we no longer need the stopgap ringbuf names. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 66 - drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 6