On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 21:29 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:15:54PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > Is that not what was written? I take it my telepathy isn't working
> > > again.
> >
> > Sorry not a new loop, new case in a old loop. This is the hunk I think
> > is not h
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:15:54PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Is that not what was written? I take it my telepathy isn't working
> > again.
>
> Sorry not a new loop, new case in a old loop. This is the hunk I think
> is not helping readability:
>
> @@ -869,11 +967,29 @@ i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_
On 11/01/16 17:03, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:11:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>
>> On 11/01/16 14:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:21:33PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/12/15 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 03:11:07PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 11/01/16 14:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:21:33PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 22/12/15 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:33AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> M
On 11/01/16 14:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:21:33PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 22/12/15 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:33AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Maybe:
if (!obj->base.filp || cpu_write_needs_clflush(obj))
r
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 02:21:33PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 22/12/15 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:33AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>Maybe:
> >>
> >>if (!obj->base.filp || cpu_write_needs_clflush(obj))
> >>ret = i915_gem_gtt_pwri
On 22/12/15 17:40, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:33AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Maybe:
if (!obj->base.filp || cpu_write_needs_clflush(obj))
ret = i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast(...);
if (ret == -EFAULT && !obj->base.filp) {
ret
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:58:33AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Maybe:
>
> if (!obj->base.filp || cpu_write_needs_clflush(obj))
> ret = i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast(...);
>
> if (ret == -EFAULT && !obj->base.filp) {
> ret = i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_slow(...) /* Ne
On 22/12/15 06:20, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote:
From: Ankitprasad Sharma
This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
for objects not backed by shmem. The access will be made through
gtt interface. This will cover objects backed by stolen memory as well
as oth
From: Ankitprasad Sharma
This patch adds support for extending the pread/pwrite functionality
for objects not backed by shmem. The access will be made through
gtt interface. This will cover objects backed by stolen memory as well
as other non-shmem backed objects.
v2: Drop locks around slow_user
10 matches
Mail list logo
