Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-28 Thread Dave Gordon
On 28/07/15 00:12, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would help. On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-28 Thread Dave Gordon
On 28/07/15 16:16, Dave Gordon wrote: On 28/07/15 00:12, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-28 Thread O'Rourke, Tom
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:40:58PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote: On 28/07/15 16:16, Dave Gordon wrote: On 28/07/15 00:12, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-28 Thread O'Rourke, Tom
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:16:03PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote: On 28/07/15 00:12, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-27 Thread Yu Dai
On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would help. On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:29:08PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote: From: Alex Dai yu@intel.com This adds the first of the data

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-27 Thread O'Rourke, Tom
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would help. On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:29:08PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-27 Thread Yu Dai
On 07/27/2015 04:12 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:41:31PM -0700, Yu Dai wrote: On 07/24/2015 03:31 PM, O'Rourke, Tom wrote: [TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would help. On Thu, Jul 09,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-24 Thread O'Rourke, Tom
[TOR:] When I see phase 1 I also look for phase 2. A subject that better describes the change in this patch would help. On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:29:08PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote: From: Alex Dai yu@intel.com This adds the first of the data structures used to communicate with the GuC

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/13 v4] drm/i915: GuC submission setup, phase 1

2015-07-09 Thread Dave Gordon
From: Alex Dai yu@intel.com This adds the first of the data structures used to communicate with the GuC (the pool of guc_context structures). We create a GuC-specific wrapper round the GEM object allocator as all GEM objects shared with the GuC must be pinned into GGTT space at an address