From: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'rou...@intel.com>

When frequency requests are made by SLPC, host driver
should not attempt to make frequency requests due to
potential conflicts.

Host-based turbo operations are already avoided when
SLPC is used.  This change covers other frequency
requests such as from sysfs or debugfs interfaces.

A later patch in this series updates sysfs/debugfs
interfaces for setting max/min frequencies with SLPC.

v2: Use intel_slpc_active instead of HAS_SLPC (Paulo)

Signed-off-by: Tom O'Rourke <Tom.O'rou...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a6246bf..be314cf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -4567,6 +4567,9 @@ void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 
 void intel_set_rps(struct drm_device *dev, u8 val)
 {
+       if (intel_slpc_active(dev))
+               return;
+
        if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev))
                valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
        else
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to