On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
>> > deprecated here, wouldn't it make m
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
> > deprecated here, wouldn't it make more sense to write
> > drm_crtc_vblank_get() in terms of struct
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
> deprecated here, wouldn't it make more sense to write
> drm_crtc_vblank_get() in terms of struct drm_crtc and make
> drm_vblank_get() call that instead? I can't seem to
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:51:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We need to start somewhere ... With this the only places left in i915
> where we use pipe integers is in the interrupt handling code. And
> there it actually makes some amount of sense.
Very much welcome addition. Some minor comments
We need to start somewhere ... With this the only places left in i915
where we use pipe integers is in the interrupt handling code. And
there it actually makes some amount of sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c| 81
d
