On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:51:10PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
We need to start somewhere ... With this the only places left in i915
where we use pipe integers is in the interrupt handling code. And
there it actually makes some amount of sense.
Very much welcome addition. Some minor comments
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
deprecated here, wouldn't it make more sense to write
drm_crtc_vblank_get() in terms of struct drm_crtc and make
drm_vblank_get() call that
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
deprecated here, wouldn't it make more sense to write
drm_crtc_vblank_get()
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Thierry Reding
thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
This seems slightly backwards. Since drm_vblank_get() is what's being
We need to start somewhere ... With this the only places left in i915
where we use pipe integers is in the interrupt handling code. And
there it actually makes some amount of sense.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c| 81