Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm: Update todo.rst

2018-09-04 Thread Emil Velikov
On 4 September 2018 at 13:19, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:38:44PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> On 3 September 2018 at 17:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> > -Hide legacy cruft better >> > - >> > - >> > -Way back DRM supported only drivers which

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm: Update todo.rst

2018-09-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:38:44PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 3 September 2018 at 17:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > -Hide legacy cruft better > > - > > - > > -Way back DRM supported only drivers which shadow-attached to PCI devices > > with > > -userspace or fbdev

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm: Update todo.rst

2018-09-03 Thread Emil Velikov
On 3 September 2018 at 17:54, Daniel Vetter wrote: > -Hide legacy cruft better > - > - > -Way back DRM supported only drivers which shadow-attached to PCI devices with > -userspace or fbdev drivers setting up outputs. Modern DRM drivers take charge > -of the entire

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm: Update todo.rst

2018-09-03 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Daniel. > -Note that this is well in progress, but ``drmP.h`` is still huge. The updated > -plan is to switch to per-file driver API headers, which will also structure > -the kerneldoc better. This should also allow more fine-grained ``#include`` > -directives. > +The DRM subsystem originally

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/14] drm: Update todo.rst

2018-09-03 Thread Daniel Vetter
- drmP.h is now fully split up. - vkms is happening (and will gain its own todo and docs under a new vkms.rst file real soon) - legacy cruft is completely hidden now, drm_vblank.c is split out from drm_irq.c now. - best_encoder atomic cleanup is done (it's now the default, not even exported