On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
>> > TODO: Do header files need a copyright?
>>
>> Yup ;-)
>>
>> I like this though, especially since finer-grained
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > TODO: Do header files need a copyright?
>
> Yup ;-)
>
> I like this though, especially since finer-grained files will make
> kerneldoc inclusion (well, grouped into s
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> TODO: Do header files need a copyright?
Yup ;-)
I like this though, especially since finer-grained files will make
kerneldoc inclusion (well, grouped into sensible chapters at least) much
simpler.
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Wid
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:48:41PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> TODO: Do header files need a copyright?
Short answer: yes.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lis
TODO: Do header files need a copyright?
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 162 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 57 -
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h | 225
3 files changed, 227
