Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-14 Thread Jason Ekstrand
This matches my understanding for what it's worth. In my little bit of synchronization work in drm, I've gone out of my way to ensure we can maintain this constraint. Acked-by: Jason Ekstrand On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:33 AM Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tediou

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-10 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 09-07-2020 om 14:33 schreef Daniel Vetter: > Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's > write this down once and for all. > > What I'm not sure about is whether the text should be more explicit in > flat out mandating the amdkfd eviction fences for long running compute >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf.rst: Document why indefinite fences are a bad idea

2020-07-09 Thread Daniel Vetter
Comes up every few years, gets somewhat tedious to discuss, let's write this down once and for all. What I'm not sure about is whether the text should be more explicit in flat out mandating the amdkfd eviction fences for long running compute workloads or workloads where userspace fencing is allowe