Dropping this patch.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:30:47PM +, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
>> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote:
>> > > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 08:30:47PM +, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> > > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f
> >
> > I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack
Em Seg, 2017-09-11 às 10:10 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> > See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f
>
> I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack
> components,
> but I don't believe we should remove ids.
>
> In the p
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote:
>> See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f
>
> I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack components,
> but I don't believe we should remove ids.
>
> In the past we h
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 04:11:33PM +, Anuj Phogat wrote:
> See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f
I believe we need to be in sync between multiple gfx stack components,
but I don't believe we should remove ids.
In the past we had cases where we noticed a product group using a listed
id to do
See Mesa commits: ebc5ccf and b2dae9f
Cc: Matt Turner
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 -
include/drm/i915_pciids.h | 15 ++-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/
