Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Clean-up and organize transition WM code.

2018-02-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:03:16PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18) > > Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended. > > > > Let's make this decision clear and call rename the > > function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false > > expectation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Clean-up and organize transition WM code.

2018-02-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18) > Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended. > > Let's make this decision clear and call rename the > function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false > expectations that transitions should be running on CNL. s/CNL/SKL/ -Chris __

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Clean-up and organize transition WM code.

2018-02-20 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18) > Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended. > > Let's make this decision clear and call rename the > function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false > expectations that transitions should be running on CNL. > > Also we remove two redun

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Clean-up and organize transition WM code.

2018-02-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended. Let's make this decision clear and call rename the function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false expectations that transitions should be running on CNL. Also we remove two redundant checks inside this function if (gen <= 9) exit if (g