On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:03:16PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18)
> > Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended.
> >
> > Let's make this decision clear and call rename the
> > function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false
> > expectation
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18)
> Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended.
>
> Let's make this decision clear and call rename the
> function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false
> expectations that transitions should be running on CNL.
s/CNL/SKL/
-Chris
__
Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2018-02-20 19:09:18)
> Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended.
>
> Let's make this decision clear and call rename the
> function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false
> expectations that transitions should be running on CNL.
>
> Also we remove two redun
Transition WM exist on gen9 but it is not recommended.
Let's make this decision clear and call rename the
function from "skl_" to "cnl_" so we don't have false
expectations that transitions should be running on CNL.
Also we remove two redundant checks inside this function
if (gen <= 9) exit
if (g