Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:14:05 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > We had two things in a row claiming to be RC6. I've applied this to drm-intel-fixes -- keith.pack...@intel.com pgp6ExioN2yBO.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gf

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

On 01/23/2012 04:14 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: We had two things in a row claiming to be RC6. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i9

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 22:14, Eric Anholt wrote: > We had two things in a row claiming to be RC6. > Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov -- Eugeni Dodonov ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

On 01/23/12 16:14, Eric Anholt wrote: We had two things in a row claiming to be RC6. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:14:05 -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > seq_printf(m, "SW control enabled: %s\n", > yesno((rpmodectl1 & GEN6_RP_MEDIA_MODE_MASK) == > GEN6_RP_MEDIA_SW_MODE)); > - seq_printf(m, "RC6 Enabled: %s\n", > + seq_printf(m, "RC1e Ena

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Correct debugfs printout for RC1e.

We had two things in a row claiming to be RC6. Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index a017b98..60dcee3 100644 ---