Quoting Matthew Auld (2020-06-05 16:00:49)
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > Across the many users of the GGTT vma (internal objects, mmapings,
> > display etc), we may end up with conflicting requirements for the
> > placement. Currently, we try to resolve the conflict
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 at 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Across the many users of the GGTT vma (internal objects, mmapings,
> display etc), we may end up with conflicting requirements for the
> placement. Currently, we try to resolve the conflict by unbinding the
> vma and rebinding it to match the
Across the many users of the GGTT vma (internal objects, mmapings,
display etc), we may end up with conflicting requirements for the
placement. Currently, we try to resolve the conflict by unbinding the
vma and rebinding it to match the new constraints; over time we will end
up with a GGTT that
