Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:24:42)
>
>
> On 4/10/2018 9:16 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:12:46)
> >> This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
> >> its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
> >> we are leaving
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
(incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.
v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that
On 4/10/2018 9:16 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:12:46)
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
(incorrectly) in
Quoting Oscar Mateo (2018-04-10 17:12:46)
> This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
> its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
> we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
> (incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal
This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
(incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.
v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that
