Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-10-24 16:23:01)
> On 24/10/2019 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-10-24 12:03:31)
> >> On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
> >> flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
> >> to failure.
> >>
> >> Define
On 24/10/2019 14:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-10-24 12:03:31)
On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
to failure.
Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
to guard against any current and
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-10-24 12:03:31)
> On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
> flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
> to failure.
>
> Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
> to guard against any current and future flag usage.
>
> v2: apply
On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
to failure.
Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
to guard against any current and future flag usage.
v2: apply also on scrub_whitelisted_registers (Lionel)
Cc: Tapani
On 24/10/2019 13:38, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
to failure.
Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
to guard against any current and future flag usage.
Cc: Tapani Pälli
Cc:
On testing the whitelists, using any of the nonpriv
flags when trying to access the register offset will lead
to failure.
Define address mask to get the mmio offset in order
to guard against any current and future flag usage.
Cc: Tapani Pälli
Cc: Chris Wilson
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala
---
