> -Original Message-
> From: Ville Syrjälä
> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 7:50 PM
> To: Murthy, Arun R
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Stop accessing crtc->state from
> the flip done irq
>
> On T
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 11:16:58PM +, Murthy, Arun R wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville
> > Syrjälä
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 7:21 PM
> > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re:
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville
> Syrjälä
> Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 7:21 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Stop accessing crtc->state from
> the flip done irq
>
>
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 06:24:49PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Assuming crtc->state is pointing at the correct thing for the
> async flip commit is nonsense. If we had already queued up multiple
> commits this would point at the very lates crtc state even if the
> older
From: Ville Syrjälä
Assuming crtc->state is pointing at the correct thing for the
async flip commit is nonsense. If we had already queued up multiple
commits this would point at the very lates crtc state even if the
older commits hadn't even happened yet.
Instead properly stage/arm the event lik
