On Fri, 2021-04-23 at 12:25 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 22-04-2021 om 13:00 schreef Mun, Gwan-gyeong:
> > The changed name looks more accurate to the edp 1.4b spec.
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:02 -0700, José Roberto de
Op 22-04-2021 om 13:00 schreef Mun, Gwan-gyeong:
> The changed name looks more accurate to the edp 1.4b spec.
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun
>
> On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:02 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
>> DP_PSR_EN_CFG bit 5 aka "Selective Update Region Scan Line
The changed name looks more accurate to the edp 1.4b spec.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun
On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 15:02 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> DP_PSR_EN_CFG bit 5 aka "Selective Update Region Scan Line Capture
> Indication" in eDP spec has a ambiguous name, so
DP_PSR_EN_CFG bit 5 aka "Selective Update Region Scan Line Capture
Indication" in eDP spec has a ambiguous name, so renaming to better
match specification.
While at it, replacing bit shit by BIT() macro and adding the version
some registers were added to eDP specification.
Cc:
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi