I wonder if GCC is doing the right thing, do we have some benchmark for
this, Chris, Mika? The code is much more readable in my eyes after the
changes.
On ti, 2016-10-04 at 15:54 +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> +static void gen8_ppgtt_clear_pt(struct i915_address_space *vm,
> +
Let's use more top-down approach, where each gen8_ppgtt_clear_* function
is responsible for clearing the struct passed as an argument and calling
relevant clear_range functions on lower-level tables.
Doing this rather than operating on PTE ranges makes the implementation
of shrinking page tables
