I pushed the series to dinq. Thanks for the review.
I think we can re-evaluate the case for the lock bit if and when someone
reports seeing the DRM_ERROR() in the wild.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.o
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:44:51PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Ter, 2017-11-14 às 22:34 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:12:41PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > > >
> > > >
Em Ter, 2017-11-14 às 22:34 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:12:41PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking
> > > v
Quoting Paulo Zanoni (2017-11-14 20:29:49)
> Em Ter, 2017-11-14 às 20:19 +, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> > Only fbc actually depends on stolen allocation to
> > function, and no one complains if fbc is disabled. (There's a sketch
> > out
> > there that we could use a contiguous allocation for fbc
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:12:41PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking
> > values
> > into the stolen "reserved" base and size, except those values
Em Ter, 2017-11-14 às 20:19 +, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> Quoting Paulo Zanoni (2017-11-14 20:12:41)
> > Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking
> > > values
> > > into the
Quoting Paulo Zanoni (2017-11-14 20:12:41)
> Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking
> > values
> > into the stolen "reserved" base and size, except those values are
> > actually
>
Em Qui, 2017-11-02 às 17:17 +0200, Ville Syrjala escreveu:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking
> values
> into the stolen "reserved" base and size, except those values are
> actually
> outside the stolen memory. There is a bit in the registe
From: Ville Syrjälä
Apparently there are some machines that put semi-sensible looking values
into the stolen "reserved" base and size, except those values are actually
outside the stolen memory. There is a bit in the register which
supposedly could tell us whether the reserved area is even enable
