Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 18:55:17) > > On 07/05/2020 16:34, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 16:23:59) > >> On 07/05/2020 16:00, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 15:53:08) > On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > > We

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

On 07/05/2020 16:23, Chris Wilson wrote: We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

On 07/05/2020 16:34, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 16:23:59) On 07/05/2020 16:00, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 15:53:08) On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 16:23:59) > > > On 07/05/2020 16:00, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 15:53:08) > >> On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>> We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could > >>> correctly perform

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are allowed to run in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

On 07/05/2020 16:00, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 15:53:08) On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-05-07 15:53:08) > > On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: > > We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could > > correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the > > common trunk. However, for the purpose of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

On 07/05/2020 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote: We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are allowed to run in

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Mark concurrent submissions with a weak-dependency

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are allowed to run in