Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Stop forcing clock gating init for future platforms

2023-09-08 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 02:50:55PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 04:45:33PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote: On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:47:34PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > In the early days of i915, pretty much every platform needed to > initialize _something_ in the clock gating

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Stop forcing clock gating init for future platforms

2023-09-08 Thread Matt Roper
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 04:45:33PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:47:34PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > In the early days of i915, pretty much every platform needed to > > initialize _something_ in the clock gating init functions. In some > > cases the items initialized

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Stop forcing clock gating init for future platforms

2023-09-08 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:47:34PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: In the early days of i915, pretty much every platform needed to initialize _something_ in the clock gating init functions. In some cases the items initialized were inside the GT (and really should have been initialized through the GT wo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Stop forcing clock gating init for future platforms

2023-09-06 Thread Matt Roper
In the early days of i915, pretty much every platform needed to initialize _something_ in the clock gating init functions. In some cases the items initialized were inside the GT (and really should have been initialized through the GT workaround infrastructure instead). In other cases they were dis