Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse()

2018-09-18 Thread Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 08:51 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:20:05AM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > Comment claims link needs to be retrained because the connected > > sink raised > > a long pulse to indicate link loss. If the sink did so, > > intel_dp_hotplug() would

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse()

2018-09-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 12:20:05AM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > Comment claims link needs to be retrained because the connected sink raised > a long pulse to indicate link loss. If the sink did so, > intel_dp_hotplug() would have handled link retraining. Looking at the > logs in Bugzilla

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/dp: Fix link retraining comment in intel_dp_long_pulse()

2018-09-18 Thread Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Comment claims link needs to be retrained because the connected sink raised a long pulse to indicate link loss. If the sink did so, intel_dp_hotplug() would have handled link retraining. Looking at the logs in Bugzilla referenced in commit '3cf71bc9904d ("drm/i915: Re-apply Perform link quality