Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image state

2020-01-24 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matt Roper (2020-01-24 00:51:17) > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 01:22:11PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > Chris Wilson writes: > > > > > Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to > > > state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image > > > su

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image state

2020-01-23 Thread Matt Roper
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 01:22:11PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson writes: > > > Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to > > state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image > > such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image state

2020-01-03 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to > state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image > such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine > samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start. > >

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image state

2020-01-02 Thread Chris Wilson
Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ---

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/gt: Include a bunch more rcs image state

2019-12-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Empirically the minimal context image we use for rcs is insufficient to state the engine. This is demonstrated if we poison the context image such that any uninitialised state is invalid, and so if the engine samples beyond our defined region, will fail to start. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson ---