From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
This information helps
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
This information helps
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
This information helps
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
This information helps
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels.
This information helps
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:32:18 +0530
Vandana Kannan wrote:
> From: Pradeep Bhat
>
> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
> parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
> whether DRRS feat
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> From: Pradeep Bhat
>
> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
> parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
> whether DRRS
On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> From: Pradeep Bhat
>>
>> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
>> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
>> parsing. The above function
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> >> From: Pradeep Bhat
> >>
> >> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
> >> The read informa
On Dec-18-2013 2:41 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and M
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> From: Pradeep Bhat
>
> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
> parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making
> whether DRRS feature is supported
On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> From: Pradeep Bhat
>>
>> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
>> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
>> parsing. The above functionality is needed for d
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>>> From: Pradeep Bhat
>>>
>>> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
>>> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS
On Jan-30-2014 11:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Vandana Kannan wrote:
>> On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote:
From: Pradeep Bhat
This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields.
The read i
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:13:17AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote:
> > Again, everywhere else in intel_bios.c we use panel_type, directly as it
> > is in VBT, 0-based. Are you saying it's all wrong? panel_type can't be
> > 1-based in this one instance, and 0-based in all other instances, right?
> >
>
15 matches
Mail list logo