[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-02-14 Thread Vandana Kannan
From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels. This information helps

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-16 Thread Vandana Kannan
From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels. This information helps

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-19 Thread Vandana Kannan
From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels. This information helps

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-20 Thread Vandana Kannan
From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels. This information helps

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-22 Thread Vandana Kannan
From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making whether DRRS feature is supported in i915 driver for eDP panels. This information helps

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-02-14 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:32:18 +0530 Vandana Kannan wrote: > From: Pradeep Bhat > > This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. > The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS > parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making > whether DRRS feat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-17 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > From: Pradeep Bhat > > This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. > The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS > parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making > whether DRRS

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-18 Thread Vandana Kannan
On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> From: Pradeep Bhat >> >> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. >> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS >> parsing. The above function

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-18 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > >> From: Pradeep Bhat > >> > >> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. > >> The read informa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2013-12-18 Thread Vandana Kannan
On Dec-18-2013 2:41 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:38:44PM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> On Dec-17-2013 5:56 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:58:23AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and M

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-01-22 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote: > From: Pradeep Bhat > > This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. > The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS > parsing. The above functionality is needed for decision making > whether DRRS feature is supported

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-01-29 Thread Vandana Kannan
On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> From: Pradeep Bhat >> >> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. >> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS >> parsing. The above functionality is needed for d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-01-29 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Vandana Kannan wrote: > On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote: >>> From: Pradeep Bhat >>> >>> This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. >>> The read information will be stored in VBT struct during BIOS

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-02-02 Thread Vandana Kannan
On Jan-30-2014 11:50 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Vandana Kannan wrote: >> On Jan-22-2014 6:39 PM, Jani Nikula wrote: >>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013, Vandana Kannan wrote: From: Pradeep Bhat This patch reads the DRRS support and Mode type from VBT fields. The read i

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Adding VBT fields to support eDP DRRS feature

2014-02-04 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 09:13:17AM +0530, Vandana Kannan wrote: > > Again, everywhere else in intel_bios.c we use panel_type, directly as it > > is in VBT, 0-based. Are you saying it's all wrong? panel_type can't be > > 1-based in this one instance, and 0-based in all other instances, right? > > >