Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state

2020-02-18 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav
On Mon, 2020-02-17 at 16:45 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:46:40AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 20:47 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > Add a global state to track the dbuf slices. Gets rid of all the > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state

2020-02-17 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 08:46:40AM +, Lisovskiy, Stanislav wrote: > On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 20:47 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > Add a global state to track the dbuf slices. Gets rid of all the > > nasty > > coupling between state->modeset and dbuf recompulation. Al

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state

2020-02-17 Thread Lisovskiy, Stanislav
On Thu, 2020-02-13 at 20:47 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Add a global state to track the dbuf slices. Gets rid of all the > nasty > coupling between state->modeset and dbuf recompulation. Also we can > now > totally nuke state->active_pipe_changes. > > dev_priv->wm.distr

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Introduce proper dbuf state

2020-02-13 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä Add a global state to track the dbuf slices. Gets rid of all the nasty coupling between state->modeset and dbuf recompulation. Also we can now totally nuke state->active_pipe_changes. dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm still remains, but should probably also get nuked from orbit l