[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: assert we're not runtime suspended when writing registers

2014-02-21 Thread Paulo Zanoni
From: Paulo Zanoni I could swear this was already happening in the current code... Also, put the reads and writes in a generic place, so we don't forget it again when we add runtime PM support to new platforms. Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 4 ++-- 1 fi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: assert we're not runtime suspended when writing registers

2014-02-28 Thread Imre Deak
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 13:52 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > I could swear this was already happening in the current code... > > Also, put the reads and writes in a generic place, so we don't forget > it again when we add runtime PM support to new platforms. > > Signed-off-by

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: assert we're not runtime suspended when writing registers

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:16:12PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 13:52 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > I could swear this was already happening in the current code... > > > > Also, put the reads and writes in a generic place, so we don't forget > > it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: assert we're not runtime suspended when writing registers

2014-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 02:44:18PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 05:16:12PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 13:52 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > From: Paulo Zanoni > > > > > > I could swear this was already happening in the current code... > > > > > >