On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 01:22:14PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 5:27 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > > As far as I can tell, the only real reason for this is to avoid taking a
> > > reference to the i915_
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 5:27 AM Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, the only real reason for this is to avoid taking a
> > reference to the i915_gem_context. The cost of those two atomics
> > probably pales in comparis
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the only real reason for this is to avoid taking a
> reference to the i915_gem_context. The cost of those two atomics
> probably pales in comparison to the cost of the ioctl itself so we're
> really not buying
As far as I can tell, the only real reason for this is to avoid taking a
reference to the i915_gem_context. The cost of those two atomics
probably pales in comparison to the cost of the ioctl itself so we're
really not buying ourselves anything here. We're about to make context
lookup a tiny bit
