Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check

2020-11-17 Thread Manna, Animesh
> -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx On Behalf Of Ville > Syrjala > Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2020 3:34 AM > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in > atomic check > > From: Maarte

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check

2020-11-13 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Maarten Lankhorst When the clock is higher than the dotclock, try with 2 pipes enabled. If we can enable 2, then we will go into big joiner mode, and steal the adjacent crtc. This only links the crtc's in software, no hardware or plane programming is done yet. Blobs are also copied fr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check.

2019-09-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 26-09-2019 om 05:48 schreef Matt Roper: > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:42:23PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> When the clock is higher than the dotclock, try with 2 pipes enabled. >> If we can enable 2, then we will go into big joiner mode, and steal >> the adjacent crtc. >> >> This only links

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check.

2019-09-25 Thread Matt Roper
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:42:23PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When the clock is higher than the dotclock, try with 2 pipes enabled. > If we can enable 2, then we will go into big joiner mode, and steal > the adjacent crtc. > > This only links the crtc's in software, no hardware or plane > p

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: Try to make bigjoiner work in atomic check.

2019-09-20 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
When the clock is higher than the dotclock, try with 2 pipes enabled. If we can enable 2, then we will go into big joiner mode, and steal the adjacent crtc. This only links the crtc's in software, no hardware or plane programming is done yet. Blobs are also copied from the master's crtc_state, so