On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:54:42 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:22:25 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:31:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
> > > largest contiguous chunk of me
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:22:25 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:31:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
> > largest contiguous chunk of memory available for enabling chipset
> > features.
> >
> > Signed-off
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 04:31:06PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
> largest contiguous chunk of memory available for enabling chipset
> features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Dave Airlie
While discussing the iterator i
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:03:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
> largest contiguous chunk of memory available for enabling chipset
> features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
> Cc: Dave Airlie
One nitpick below.
> @@ -99,6
This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
largest contiguous chunk of memory available for enabling chipset
features.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 55 +++---
include/drm/drm_mm.h
This will be used i915 in forthcoming patches in order to measure the
largest contiguous chunk of memory available for enabling chipset
features.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Dave Airlie
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mm.c | 55 +++---
include/drm/drm_mm.h
