Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Calculate visibility in check_plane correctly regardless of dpms.

2015-12-21 Thread Mika Kahola
Ander had a comment s/During// Other than this is On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 16:07 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When the crtc is configured but not active we currently clip to (0,0)x(0,0). > This results in differences in calculations depending on dpms setting. > When the crtc is enabled but not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Calculate visibility in check_plane correctly regardless of dpms.

2015-11-30 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 26-11-15 om 14:48 schreef Ander Conselvan De Oliveira: > On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 16:07 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: >> When the crtc is configured but not active we currently clip to (0,0)x(0,0). >> This results in differences in calculations depending on dpms setting. > Is this part of "and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Calculate visibility in check_plane correctly regardless of dpms.

2015-11-26 Thread Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 16:07 +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > When the crtc is configured but not active we currently clip to (0,0)x(0,0). > This results in differences in calculations depending on dpms setting. Is this part of "and fix BAT!"? > When the crtc is enabled but not active run

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/12] drm/i915: Calculate visibility in check_plane correctly regardless of dpms.

2015-11-19 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
When the crtc is configured but not active we currently clip to (0,0)x(0,0). This results in differences in calculations depending on dpms setting. When the crtc is enabled but not active run check_plane as if it were on, but afterwards set plane_state->visible = false for the checks.