On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 05:00:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:14:05AM +0530, Arun R Murthy wrote:
On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:14:05AM +0530, Arun R Murthy wrote:
On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead
On Friday 06 March 2015 12:49 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
programmed to compensate for the
On 03/05/2015 11:19 AM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
programmed to compensate for the latency and
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
DDR DVFS introduces massive memory latencies which can't be handled by
the PND deadline stuff. Instead the watermarks will need to be
programmed to compensate for the latency and the deadlines will need to
be programmed to tight fixed values. That
