On pe, 2016-07-22 at 09:30 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:59AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> >
> > On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > Rather than pass in the num_dwords that the caller wishes to use after
> > > the signal command
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:15:59AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Rather than pass in the num_dwords that the caller wishes to use after
> > the signal command packet, split the breadcrumb emission into two phases
> > and have both the
On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Rather than pass in the num_dwords that the caller wishes to use after
> the signal command packet, split the breadcrumb emission into two phases
> and have both the signal and breadcrumb individiually acquire space on
> the ring. This makes
Rather than pass in the num_dwords that the caller wishes to use after
the signal command packet, split the breadcrumb emission into two phases
and have both the signal and breadcrumb individiually acquire space on
the ring. This makes the interface simpler for the reader, and will
simplify for
