Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-19 14:37:01)
>
> On 17/09/2019 19:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-17 13:37:55)
> >> On 02/09/2019 05:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>> +void i915_active_set_exclusive(struct i915_active *ref, struct dma_fence
> >>> *f)
> >>> +{
> >>> +
On 17/09/2019 19:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-17 13:37:55)
On 02/09/2019 05:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
index 82db2b783123..9a8c307c5aeb 100644
---
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-17 13:37:55)
> On 02/09/2019 05:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > index 82db2b783123..9a8c307c5aeb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c
> > +++
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-16 11:13:23)
>
> On 02/09/2019 05:02, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
> > local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
> > shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim)
Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate
Replace the struct_mutex requirement for pinning the i915_vma with the
local vm->mutex instead. Note that the vm->mutex is tainted by the
shrinker (we require unbinding from inside fs-reclaim) and so we cannot
allocate while holding that mutex. Instead we have to preallocate
workers to do allocate
