This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
that finnaly enable psr by adding it to HAS_PSR
and calling the proper enable and disable
functions on the right places.
Although it is still disabled by default.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr and merge Durgadoss's fixes.
Cc: Durgadoss R
Signed-off-b
Daniel, I think this is the only one of this series with pending
reviewed-by right?
Durga or Paulo, could you please help me on this?
Thank you,
Rodrigo.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
> that finnaly enable psr by adding i
>-Original Message-
>From: Rodrigo Vivi [mailto:rodrigo.v...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 10:55 PM
>To: Vivi, Rodrigo; R, Durgadoss; Zanoni, Paulo R; Daniel Vetter
>Cc: intel-gfx
>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Enable PSR for Baytr
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:52:41AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
> that finnaly enable psr by adding it to HAS_PSR
> and calling the proper enable and disable
> functions on the right places.
>
> Although it is still disabled by default.
>
> v2: Reb
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:52:41AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
>> that finnaly enable psr by adding it to HAS_PSR
>> and calling the proper enable and disable
>> functions on the right place
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:30:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:52:41AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >> This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR,
> >> that finnaly enable psr by adding it to HAS_PSR
> >> a
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:30:58AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:52:41AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> >> This patch is the last in series of VLV/CHV PSR
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:12:30AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> But with your point in mind I got worried about FBC. One of my tasks
> that should be easily here was to put FBC on SKL on the same stage
> that we have currently on previous platforms. Should I just skip that
> while we don't really h
