Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915: Push the i915_active.retire into a worker

2019-06-17 Thread Matthew Auld
On 17/06/2019 08:19, Chris Wilson wrote: As we need to use a mutex to serialisation i915_active activation to serialise (because we want to allow the callback to sleep), we need to push the i915_active.retire into a worker callback in case we get need to retire from an atomic context. Signed

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 16/22] drm/i915: Push the i915_active.retire into a worker

2019-06-17 Thread Chris Wilson
As we need to use a mutex to serialisation i915_active activation (because we want to allow the callback to sleep), we need to push the i915_active.retire into a worker callback in case we get need to retire from an atomic context. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_ge