On 04/01/16 14:20, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:09:53PM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 04/01/16 13:02, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 04/01/16 11:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14,
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:09:53PM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 04/01/16 13:02, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >On 04/01/16 11:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >>>On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +,
On 04/01/16 13:02, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 04/01/16 11:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now th
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:02:25PM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 04/01/16 11:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >>On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> >>
On 04/01/16 11:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 11:16:04AM +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier from the
> >>>engin
On 14/12/15 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
Hi,
On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier from the
engine->get_seqno() callback itself, we can move the users of the
seqno-barrier to the requir
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 02:59:30PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier from the
> >engine->get_seqno() callback itself, we can move the users of the
> >seqno-barrier to the required callsites simplifying t
Hi,
On 11/12/15 11:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier from the
engine->get_seqno() callback itself, we can move the users of the
seqno-barrier to the required callsites simplifying the common code and
making the required workaround handling much more explicit.
Now that we have split out the seqno-barrier from the
engine->get_seqno() callback itself, we can move the users of the
seqno-barrier to the required callsites simplifying the common code and
making the required workaround handling much more explicit.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/
10 matches
Mail list logo