Quoting John Harrison (2019-01-10 01:10:09)
> On 1/9/2019 16:24, John Harrison wrote:
> > On 1/7/2019 03:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
> >> Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
> >> automatic closu
On 1/9/2019 16:24, John Harrison wrote:
On 1/7/2019 03:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. m
On 1/7/2019 03:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.
Signed-of
Chris Wilson writes:
> Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
> Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
> automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
> i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.
>
> Signed-off-by: C
Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Jani Nikula
---
