On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:15:51PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 03:49:43PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Re-do what was attempted in commit 7a5c922377b4 ("drm/i915/gt: Split
intel-gtt functions by arch"). The goal of that commit was to split the
handlers for older hardware th
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 03:49:43PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Re-do what was attempted in commit 7a5c922377b4 ("drm/i915/gt: Split
> intel-gtt functions by arch"). The goal of that commit was to split the
> handlers for older hardware that depend on intel-gtt.ko so i915 can
> be built for non-
On 16/06/2022 23:49, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
Re-do what was attempted in commit 7a5c922377b4 ("drm/i915/gt: Split
intel-gtt functions by arch"). The goal of that commit was to split the
handlers for older hardware that depend on intel-gtt.ko so i915 can
be built for non-x86 archs, after some mor
Re-do what was attempted in commit 7a5c922377b4 ("drm/i915/gt: Split
intel-gtt functions by arch"). The goal of that commit was to split the
handlers for older hardware that depend on intel-gtt.ko so i915 can
be built for non-x86 archs, after some more patches. Other archs do not
need intel-gtt.ko.
