On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 14:44 +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 10:31 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:42:07PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > >
> > > A read(fd, buf, len) function should return the number
> > > of bytes read. In our case we need to return
On Wed, 2016-08-03 at 10:31 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:42:07PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> >
> > A read(fd, buf, len) function should return the number
> > of bytes read. In our case we need to return the
> > number of bytes we copy to user, instead of returning
> >
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:42:07PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> A read(fd, buf, len) function should return the number
> of bytes read. In our case we need to return the
> number of bytes we copy to user, instead of returning
> the number of bytes we read internally.
>
> It was really strange when
On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 09:42:07PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> A read(fd, buf, len) function should return the number
> of bytes read. In our case we need to return the
> number of bytes we copy to user, instead of returning
> the number of bytes we read internally.
>
> It was really strange when
A read(fd, buf, len) function should return the number
of bytes read. In our case we need to return the
number of bytes we copy to user, instead of returning
the number of bytes we read internally.
It was really strange when I saw i-g-t test case using
len '54' but getting '56' as return. First th
