Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Let's avoid even early init if SLPC is used.

2022-09-02 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Fri, 2022-09-02 at 07:16 -0700, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Fri, 02 Sep 2022 02:51:26 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > > index 6fadde4ee7bf..c29652281f2e 100644 > > ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Let's avoid even early init if SLPC is used.

2022-09-02 Thread Dixit, Ashutosh
On Fri, 02 Sep 2022 02:51:26 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > index 6fadde4ee7bf..c29652281f2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c > @@ -1960,6

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Let's avoid even early init if SLPC is used.

2022-09-02 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
SLPC has its own waiboost variables and lock mechanism. No need for these extra stuff, in special no need for the timer. Cc: Ashutosh Dixit Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git