2015-09-02 17:53 GMT-03:00 ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk :
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:20:52PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
>> Em Qua, 2015-08-26 às 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:03:42PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> > > The unclaimed register bit is only triggere
2015-09-02 17:53 GMT-03:00 ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk :
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:20:52PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
>> Em Qua, 2015-08-26 às 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:03:42PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
>> > > The unclaimed register bit is only triggere
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:20:52PM +, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote:
> Em Qua, 2015-08-26 às 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:03:42PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > > The unclaimed register bit is only triggered when someone touches
> > > the
> > > specified register
Em Qua, 2015-08-26 às 08:44 +0100, Chris Wilson escreveu:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:03:42PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > The unclaimed register bit is only triggered when someone touches
> > the
> > specified register range.
> >
> > For the normal use case (with i915.mmio_debug=0), this comm
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 7256
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK -1
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 07:03:42PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> The unclaimed register bit is only triggered when someone touches the
> specified register range.
>
> For the normal use case (with i915.mmio_debug=0), this commit will
> avoid the extra __raw_i915_read32() call for every register out
The unclaimed register bit is only triggered when someone touches the
specified register range.
For the normal use case (with i915.mmio_debug=0), this commit will
avoid the extra __raw_i915_read32() call for every register outside
the specified range, at the expense of a few additional "if"
statem
