Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] eventfd: simplify eventfd_signal_mask()

2023-07-13 Thread Christian Brauner
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 07:33:05AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, Christian Brauner wrote: > > diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c > > index dc9e01053235..077be5da72bd 100644 > > --- a/fs/eventfd.c > > +++ b/fs/eventfd.c > > @@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ struct eventfd_ctx { >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] eventfd: simplify eventfd_signal_mask()

2023-07-13 Thread Sean Christopherson
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, Christian Brauner wrote: > diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c > index dc9e01053235..077be5da72bd 100644 > --- a/fs/eventfd.c > +++ b/fs/eventfd.c > @@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ struct eventfd_ctx { > int id; > }; > > -__u64 eventfd_signal_mask(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] eventfd: simplify eventfd_signal_mask()

2023-07-13 Thread Christian Brauner
The eventfd_signal_mask() helper was introduced for io_uring and similar to eventfd_signal() it always passed 1 for @n. So don't bother with that argument at all. Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/interrupt.c | 2 +- fs/eventfd.c | 9 +